differential interference contrast (dic) microscopy Search Results


99
Carl Zeiss differential interference contrast dic microscope
The cuticular sculpturing of Ramazzottius groenlandensis sp. nov. <t>Differential</t> <t>interference</t> <t>contrast</t> <t>microscope</t> <t>(DIC)</t> images and SEM images: A – C DIC images; D – F SEM images. A , D cuticular surface of the head region. B , E cuticular surface of the middle part of the trunk. C , F cuticular surface of the posterior part of the trunk
Differential Interference Contrast Dic Microscope, supplied by Carl Zeiss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/differential interference contrast dic microscope/product/Carl Zeiss
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
differential interference contrast dic microscope - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Carl Zeiss axioscope differential interference contrast dic microscope
The cuticular sculpturing of Ramazzottius groenlandensis sp. nov. <t>Differential</t> <t>interference</t> <t>contrast</t> <t>microscope</t> <t>(DIC)</t> images and SEM images: A – C DIC images; D – F SEM images. A , D cuticular surface of the head region. B , E cuticular surface of the middle part of the trunk. C , F cuticular surface of the posterior part of the trunk
Axioscope Differential Interference Contrast Dic Microscope, supplied by Carl Zeiss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/axioscope differential interference contrast dic microscope/product/Carl Zeiss
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
axioscope differential interference contrast dic microscope - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Carl Zeiss upright infrared differential interference contrast (ir-dic) microscope axioskop
The cuticular sculpturing of Ramazzottius groenlandensis sp. nov. <t>Differential</t> <t>interference</t> <t>contrast</t> <t>microscope</t> <t>(DIC)</t> images and SEM images: A – C DIC images; D – F SEM images. A , D cuticular surface of the head region. B , E cuticular surface of the middle part of the trunk. C , F cuticular surface of the posterior part of the trunk
Upright Infrared Differential Interference Contrast (Ir Dic) Microscope Axioskop, supplied by Carl Zeiss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/upright infrared differential interference contrast (ir-dic) microscope axioskop/product/Carl Zeiss
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
upright infrared differential interference contrast (ir-dic) microscope axioskop - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Carl Zeiss differential interference contrast ( dic ) with nomarski microscopy
The cuticular sculpturing of Ramazzottius groenlandensis sp. nov. <t>Differential</t> <t>interference</t> <t>contrast</t> <t>microscope</t> <t>(DIC)</t> images and SEM images: A – C DIC images; D – F SEM images. A , D cuticular surface of the head region. B , E cuticular surface of the middle part of the trunk. C , F cuticular surface of the posterior part of the trunk
Differential Interference Contrast ( Dic ) With Nomarski Microscopy, supplied by Carl Zeiss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/differential interference contrast ( dic ) with nomarski microscopy/product/Carl Zeiss
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
differential interference contrast ( dic ) with nomarski microscopy - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Carl Zeiss differential interference contrast (dic) and fluorescence imaging
(n = 200±20 each for data in Fig. 2A to C). A: The proportion of aggregate free cells: Both short term exposure and long term selection in low nutrient concentrations increased the proportion of aggregate free cells. (chi sq = 38.15, p<0.0001). B: The mean <t>fluorescence</t> intensities of cells (expressed relative to mean Wh including aggregate free cells) under the 6 selection nutrition combinations: The grey columns denote the average including cells without visible aggregates. The black columns denote average calculated by excluding the aggregate free cells. *denotes significant difference from Wh. $ denotes significant difference between corresponding h and l conditions (at p<0.05). C: Frequency distribution of cells with fluorescence intensity classes of aggregates: The modal class is 1 except in Lh and Ll where the modal class is 0. The proportion of cells in different intensity classes across the three selection lines differed significantly at high nutrient concentration (for Wh, Hh and Lh Chi square = 57.157, df = 6, P<0.0001) as well as low nutrient concentration (For Wl , Hl and Ll Chi square = 35.317, df = 6, P<0.0001). The effect of current nutrient concentration was not significant for W (Chi square = 2.35, df = 3, P = 0.503) but was significant for H (Chi square = 7.138, df = 3, P = 0.0676) and L (Chi square = 9.415, df = 3, P = 0.0243).
Differential Interference Contrast (Dic) And Fluorescence Imaging, supplied by Carl Zeiss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/differential interference contrast (dic) and fluorescence imaging/product/Carl Zeiss
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
differential interference contrast (dic) and fluorescence imaging - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Carl Zeiss differential interference contrast (dic) microscopy zeiss axio imager a2 upright microscope
(n = 200±20 each for data in Fig. 2A to C). A: The proportion of aggregate free cells: Both short term exposure and long term selection in low nutrient concentrations increased the proportion of aggregate free cells. (chi sq = 38.15, p<0.0001). B: The mean <t>fluorescence</t> intensities of cells (expressed relative to mean Wh including aggregate free cells) under the 6 selection nutrition combinations: The grey columns denote the average including cells without visible aggregates. The black columns denote average calculated by excluding the aggregate free cells. *denotes significant difference from Wh. $ denotes significant difference between corresponding h and l conditions (at p<0.05). C: Frequency distribution of cells with fluorescence intensity classes of aggregates: The modal class is 1 except in Lh and Ll where the modal class is 0. The proportion of cells in different intensity classes across the three selection lines differed significantly at high nutrient concentration (for Wh, Hh and Lh Chi square = 57.157, df = 6, P<0.0001) as well as low nutrient concentration (For Wl , Hl and Ll Chi square = 35.317, df = 6, P<0.0001). The effect of current nutrient concentration was not significant for W (Chi square = 2.35, df = 3, P = 0.503) but was significant for H (Chi square = 7.138, df = 3, P = 0.0676) and L (Chi square = 9.415, df = 3, P = 0.0243).
Differential Interference Contrast (Dic) Microscopy Zeiss Axio Imager A2 Upright Microscope, supplied by Carl Zeiss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/differential interference contrast (dic) microscopy zeiss axio imager a2 upright microscope/product/Carl Zeiss
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
differential interference contrast (dic) microscopy zeiss axio imager a2 upright microscope - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Carl Zeiss differential interference (dic) microscopy
(n = 200±20 each for data in Fig. 2A to C). A: The proportion of aggregate free cells: Both short term exposure and long term selection in low nutrient concentrations increased the proportion of aggregate free cells. (chi sq = 38.15, p<0.0001). B: The mean <t>fluorescence</t> intensities of cells (expressed relative to mean Wh including aggregate free cells) under the 6 selection nutrition combinations: The grey columns denote the average including cells without visible aggregates. The black columns denote average calculated by excluding the aggregate free cells. *denotes significant difference from Wh. $ denotes significant difference between corresponding h and l conditions (at p<0.05). C: Frequency distribution of cells with fluorescence intensity classes of aggregates: The modal class is 1 except in Lh and Ll where the modal class is 0. The proportion of cells in different intensity classes across the three selection lines differed significantly at high nutrient concentration (for Wh, Hh and Lh Chi square = 57.157, df = 6, P<0.0001) as well as low nutrient concentration (For Wl , Hl and Ll Chi square = 35.317, df = 6, P<0.0001). The effect of current nutrient concentration was not significant for W (Chi square = 2.35, df = 3, P = 0.503) but was significant for H (Chi square = 7.138, df = 3, P = 0.0676) and L (Chi square = 9.415, df = 3, P = 0.0243).
Differential Interference (Dic) Microscopy, supplied by Carl Zeiss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/differential interference (dic) microscopy/product/Carl Zeiss
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
differential interference (dic) microscopy - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Carl Zeiss infrared differential interference contrast (ir-dic) microscopy zeiss akioskop
(n = 200±20 each for data in Fig. 2A to C). A: The proportion of aggregate free cells: Both short term exposure and long term selection in low nutrient concentrations increased the proportion of aggregate free cells. (chi sq = 38.15, p<0.0001). B: The mean <t>fluorescence</t> intensities of cells (expressed relative to mean Wh including aggregate free cells) under the 6 selection nutrition combinations: The grey columns denote the average including cells without visible aggregates. The black columns denote average calculated by excluding the aggregate free cells. *denotes significant difference from Wh. $ denotes significant difference between corresponding h and l conditions (at p<0.05). C: Frequency distribution of cells with fluorescence intensity classes of aggregates: The modal class is 1 except in Lh and Ll where the modal class is 0. The proportion of cells in different intensity classes across the three selection lines differed significantly at high nutrient concentration (for Wh, Hh and Lh Chi square = 57.157, df = 6, P<0.0001) as well as low nutrient concentration (For Wl , Hl and Ll Chi square = 35.317, df = 6, P<0.0001). The effect of current nutrient concentration was not significant for W (Chi square = 2.35, df = 3, P = 0.503) but was significant for H (Chi square = 7.138, df = 3, P = 0.0676) and L (Chi square = 9.415, df = 3, P = 0.0243).
Infrared Differential Interference Contrast (Ir Dic) Microscopy Zeiss Akioskop, supplied by Carl Zeiss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/infrared differential interference contrast (ir-dic) microscopy zeiss akioskop/product/Carl Zeiss
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
infrared differential interference contrast (ir-dic) microscopy zeiss akioskop - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Carl Zeiss differential inference contrast (dic) microscopy axioskop 2 mot plus
(n = 200±20 each for data in Fig. 2A to C). A: The proportion of aggregate free cells: Both short term exposure and long term selection in low nutrient concentrations increased the proportion of aggregate free cells. (chi sq = 38.15, p<0.0001). B: The mean <t>fluorescence</t> intensities of cells (expressed relative to mean Wh including aggregate free cells) under the 6 selection nutrition combinations: The grey columns denote the average including cells without visible aggregates. The black columns denote average calculated by excluding the aggregate free cells. *denotes significant difference from Wh. $ denotes significant difference between corresponding h and l conditions (at p<0.05). C: Frequency distribution of cells with fluorescence intensity classes of aggregates: The modal class is 1 except in Lh and Ll where the modal class is 0. The proportion of cells in different intensity classes across the three selection lines differed significantly at high nutrient concentration (for Wh, Hh and Lh Chi square = 57.157, df = 6, P<0.0001) as well as low nutrient concentration (For Wl , Hl and Ll Chi square = 35.317, df = 6, P<0.0001). The effect of current nutrient concentration was not significant for W (Chi square = 2.35, df = 3, P = 0.503) but was significant for H (Chi square = 7.138, df = 3, P = 0.0676) and L (Chi square = 9.415, df = 3, P = 0.0243).
Differential Inference Contrast (Dic) Microscopy Axioskop 2 Mot Plus, supplied by Carl Zeiss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/differential inference contrast (dic) microscopy axioskop 2 mot plus/product/Carl Zeiss
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
differential inference contrast (dic) microscopy axioskop 2 mot plus - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Carl Zeiss differential interference contrast (dic) microscopy with a zeiss axiocam hrc high-resolution camera
(n = 200±20 each for data in Fig. 2A to C). A: The proportion of aggregate free cells: Both short term exposure and long term selection in low nutrient concentrations increased the proportion of aggregate free cells. (chi sq = 38.15, p<0.0001). B: The mean <t>fluorescence</t> intensities of cells (expressed relative to mean Wh including aggregate free cells) under the 6 selection nutrition combinations: The grey columns denote the average including cells without visible aggregates. The black columns denote average calculated by excluding the aggregate free cells. *denotes significant difference from Wh. $ denotes significant difference between corresponding h and l conditions (at p<0.05). C: Frequency distribution of cells with fluorescence intensity classes of aggregates: The modal class is 1 except in Lh and Ll where the modal class is 0. The proportion of cells in different intensity classes across the three selection lines differed significantly at high nutrient concentration (for Wh, Hh and Lh Chi square = 57.157, df = 6, P<0.0001) as well as low nutrient concentration (For Wl , Hl and Ll Chi square = 35.317, df = 6, P<0.0001). The effect of current nutrient concentration was not significant for W (Chi square = 2.35, df = 3, P = 0.503) but was significant for H (Chi square = 7.138, df = 3, P = 0.0676) and L (Chi square = 9.415, df = 3, P = 0.0243).
Differential Interference Contrast (Dic) Microscopy With A Zeiss Axiocam Hrc High Resolution Camera, supplied by Carl Zeiss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/differential interference contrast (dic) microscopy with a zeiss axiocam hrc high-resolution camera/product/Carl Zeiss
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
differential interference contrast (dic) microscopy with a zeiss axiocam hrc high-resolution camera - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Carl Zeiss infrared video microscopy and differential interference contrast (dic) optics
(n = 200±20 each for data in Fig. 2A to C). A: The proportion of aggregate free cells: Both short term exposure and long term selection in low nutrient concentrations increased the proportion of aggregate free cells. (chi sq = 38.15, p<0.0001). B: The mean <t>fluorescence</t> intensities of cells (expressed relative to mean Wh including aggregate free cells) under the 6 selection nutrition combinations: The grey columns denote the average including cells without visible aggregates. The black columns denote average calculated by excluding the aggregate free cells. *denotes significant difference from Wh. $ denotes significant difference between corresponding h and l conditions (at p<0.05). C: Frequency distribution of cells with fluorescence intensity classes of aggregates: The modal class is 1 except in Lh and Ll where the modal class is 0. The proportion of cells in different intensity classes across the three selection lines differed significantly at high nutrient concentration (for Wh, Hh and Lh Chi square = 57.157, df = 6, P<0.0001) as well as low nutrient concentration (For Wl , Hl and Ll Chi square = 35.317, df = 6, P<0.0001). The effect of current nutrient concentration was not significant for W (Chi square = 2.35, df = 3, P = 0.503) but was significant for H (Chi square = 7.138, df = 3, P = 0.0676) and L (Chi square = 9.415, df = 3, P = 0.0243).
Infrared Video Microscopy And Differential Interference Contrast (Dic) Optics, supplied by Carl Zeiss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/infrared video microscopy and differential interference contrast (dic) optics/product/Carl Zeiss
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
infrared video microscopy and differential interference contrast (dic) optics - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SAS institute differential interference contrast (dic) microscopy-based rnai screen
(n = 200±20 each for data in Fig. 2A to C). A: The proportion of aggregate free cells: Both short term exposure and long term selection in low nutrient concentrations increased the proportion of aggregate free cells. (chi sq = 38.15, p<0.0001). B: The mean <t>fluorescence</t> intensities of cells (expressed relative to mean Wh including aggregate free cells) under the 6 selection nutrition combinations: The grey columns denote the average including cells without visible aggregates. The black columns denote average calculated by excluding the aggregate free cells. *denotes significant difference from Wh. $ denotes significant difference between corresponding h and l conditions (at p<0.05). C: Frequency distribution of cells with fluorescence intensity classes of aggregates: The modal class is 1 except in Lh and Ll where the modal class is 0. The proportion of cells in different intensity classes across the three selection lines differed significantly at high nutrient concentration (for Wh, Hh and Lh Chi square = 57.157, df = 6, P<0.0001) as well as low nutrient concentration (For Wl , Hl and Ll Chi square = 35.317, df = 6, P<0.0001). The effect of current nutrient concentration was not significant for W (Chi square = 2.35, df = 3, P = 0.503) but was significant for H (Chi square = 7.138, df = 3, P = 0.0676) and L (Chi square = 9.415, df = 3, P = 0.0243).
Differential Interference Contrast (Dic) Microscopy Based Rnai Screen, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/differential interference contrast (dic) microscopy-based rnai screen/product/SAS institute
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
differential interference contrast (dic) microscopy-based rnai screen - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


The cuticular sculpturing of Ramazzottius groenlandensis sp. nov. Differential interference contrast microscope (DIC) images and SEM images: A – C DIC images; D – F SEM images. A , D cuticular surface of the head region. B , E cuticular surface of the middle part of the trunk. C , F cuticular surface of the posterior part of the trunk

Journal: Zoological Letters

Article Title: Homology of the head sensory structures between Heterotardigrada and Eutardigrada supported in a new species of water bear (Ramazzottiidae: Ramazzottius )

doi: 10.1186/s40851-023-00221-w

Figure Lengend Snippet: The cuticular sculpturing of Ramazzottius groenlandensis sp. nov. Differential interference contrast microscope (DIC) images and SEM images: A – C DIC images; D – F SEM images. A , D cuticular surface of the head region. B , E cuticular surface of the middle part of the trunk. C , F cuticular surface of the posterior part of the trunk

Article Snippet: Subsequently, the slides were dried seven days at 60ºC, sealed with nail polish, and examined under a differential interference contrast (DIC) microscope (Carl Zeiss Axio Imager 2), with the camera AxioCam HRc.

Techniques: Microscopy

Head sensory organs of Ramazzottius groenlandensis sp. nov. Differential interference contrast microscope (DIC) images and SEM images: A – D SEM images; E DIC images. A head region. B frontal lobe. C centrodorsal organ (CO). D , E elliptical organ (EO). Arrows and arrow head indicate pores and EO, respectively. AVL: anteroventral lobe; CMAS: cribriform muscle attachment site; CO: centrodorsal organ; EO: elliptical organ; PBL: peribuccal lobe

Journal: Zoological Letters

Article Title: Homology of the head sensory structures between Heterotardigrada and Eutardigrada supported in a new species of water bear (Ramazzottiidae: Ramazzottius )

doi: 10.1186/s40851-023-00221-w

Figure Lengend Snippet: Head sensory organs of Ramazzottius groenlandensis sp. nov. Differential interference contrast microscope (DIC) images and SEM images: A – D SEM images; E DIC images. A head region. B frontal lobe. C centrodorsal organ (CO). D , E elliptical organ (EO). Arrows and arrow head indicate pores and EO, respectively. AVL: anteroventral lobe; CMAS: cribriform muscle attachment site; CO: centrodorsal organ; EO: elliptical organ; PBL: peribuccal lobe

Article Snippet: Subsequently, the slides were dried seven days at 60ºC, sealed with nail polish, and examined under a differential interference contrast (DIC) microscope (Carl Zeiss Axio Imager 2), with the camera AxioCam HRc.

Techniques: Microscopy

Legs and claws of Ramazzottius groenlandensis sp. nov. Differential interference contrast microscope (DIC) images and SEM images: A – D , G , I SEM images; E , F , H DIC images. A leg I B leg II C – E leg IV. Arrows indicate papilla on leg IV. F claw I. G claw II. H – I claw IV

Journal: Zoological Letters

Article Title: Homology of the head sensory structures between Heterotardigrada and Eutardigrada supported in a new species of water bear (Ramazzottiidae: Ramazzottius )

doi: 10.1186/s40851-023-00221-w

Figure Lengend Snippet: Legs and claws of Ramazzottius groenlandensis sp. nov. Differential interference contrast microscope (DIC) images and SEM images: A – D , G , I SEM images; E , F , H DIC images. A leg I B leg II C – E leg IV. Arrows indicate papilla on leg IV. F claw I. G claw II. H – I claw IV

Article Snippet: Subsequently, the slides were dried seven days at 60ºC, sealed with nail polish, and examined under a differential interference contrast (DIC) microscope (Carl Zeiss Axio Imager 2), with the camera AxioCam HRc.

Techniques: Microscopy

Ramazzottius groenlandensis sp. nov. Differential interference contrast microscope (DIC) images and SEM images: A , B DIC images; C , D SEM images. A a living specimen. B the holotype. C , D dorsal view and oblique lateral view

Journal: Zoological Letters

Article Title: Homology of the head sensory structures between Heterotardigrada and Eutardigrada supported in a new species of water bear (Ramazzottiidae: Ramazzottius )

doi: 10.1186/s40851-023-00221-w

Figure Lengend Snippet: Ramazzottius groenlandensis sp. nov. Differential interference contrast microscope (DIC) images and SEM images: A , B DIC images; C , D SEM images. A a living specimen. B the holotype. C , D dorsal view and oblique lateral view

Article Snippet: Subsequently, the slides were dried seven days at 60ºC, sealed with nail polish, and examined under a differential interference contrast (DIC) microscope (Carl Zeiss Axio Imager 2), with the camera AxioCam HRc.

Techniques: Microscopy

The mouth opening and the buccal-pharyngeal apparatus of Ramazzottius groenlandensis sp. nov. Differential interference contrast microscope (DIC) images and SEM images: A , B , E – I SEM images; C , D DIC images. A anterior view of the mouth and the peribuccal lobes. Arrow and arrowhead indicate the peribuccal lobe and the mouth opening, respectively. B oral cavity armature with two bands of teeth and perforated area. Arrow and arrowhead indicate the first band and the second band of teeth, respectively. C ventral view of the buccal-pharyngeal apparatus. D oblique lateral view of the buccal-pharyngeal apparatus. E ventral view of the buccal-pharyngeal apparatus. F lateral view of the buccal-pharyngeal apparatus. G ventral view of the apophysis for the insertion of the stylet muscles (AISM). Arrows indicate the posterior tips of AISM. H oblique lateral view of the AISM. I placoids. Arrows indicate placoid constrictions

Journal: Zoological Letters

Article Title: Homology of the head sensory structures between Heterotardigrada and Eutardigrada supported in a new species of water bear (Ramazzottiidae: Ramazzottius )

doi: 10.1186/s40851-023-00221-w

Figure Lengend Snippet: The mouth opening and the buccal-pharyngeal apparatus of Ramazzottius groenlandensis sp. nov. Differential interference contrast microscope (DIC) images and SEM images: A , B , E – I SEM images; C , D DIC images. A anterior view of the mouth and the peribuccal lobes. Arrow and arrowhead indicate the peribuccal lobe and the mouth opening, respectively. B oral cavity armature with two bands of teeth and perforated area. Arrow and arrowhead indicate the first band and the second band of teeth, respectively. C ventral view of the buccal-pharyngeal apparatus. D oblique lateral view of the buccal-pharyngeal apparatus. E ventral view of the buccal-pharyngeal apparatus. F lateral view of the buccal-pharyngeal apparatus. G ventral view of the apophysis for the insertion of the stylet muscles (AISM). Arrows indicate the posterior tips of AISM. H oblique lateral view of the AISM. I placoids. Arrows indicate placoid constrictions

Article Snippet: Subsequently, the slides were dried seven days at 60ºC, sealed with nail polish, and examined under a differential interference contrast (DIC) microscope (Carl Zeiss Axio Imager 2), with the camera AxioCam HRc.

Techniques: Microscopy, Muscles

Eggs of Ramazzottius groenlandensis sp. nov. Differential interference contrast microscope (DIC) images and SEM images: A , D , E DIC images; B , C , F SEM images. A a whole egg. B two eggs. C granulated surface of the egg chorion. D – E variable morphology of processes. F processes with a concave tip. Arrows indicate filamentous processes

Journal: Zoological Letters

Article Title: Homology of the head sensory structures between Heterotardigrada and Eutardigrada supported in a new species of water bear (Ramazzottiidae: Ramazzottius )

doi: 10.1186/s40851-023-00221-w

Figure Lengend Snippet: Eggs of Ramazzottius groenlandensis sp. nov. Differential interference contrast microscope (DIC) images and SEM images: A , D , E DIC images; B , C , F SEM images. A a whole egg. B two eggs. C granulated surface of the egg chorion. D – E variable morphology of processes. F processes with a concave tip. Arrows indicate filamentous processes

Article Snippet: Subsequently, the slides were dried seven days at 60ºC, sealed with nail polish, and examined under a differential interference contrast (DIC) microscope (Carl Zeiss Axio Imager 2), with the camera AxioCam HRc.

Techniques: Microscopy

(n = 200±20 each for data in Fig. 2A to C). A: The proportion of aggregate free cells: Both short term exposure and long term selection in low nutrient concentrations increased the proportion of aggregate free cells. (chi sq = 38.15, p<0.0001). B: The mean fluorescence intensities of cells (expressed relative to mean Wh including aggregate free cells) under the 6 selection nutrition combinations: The grey columns denote the average including cells without visible aggregates. The black columns denote average calculated by excluding the aggregate free cells. *denotes significant difference from Wh. $ denotes significant difference between corresponding h and l conditions (at p<0.05). C: Frequency distribution of cells with fluorescence intensity classes of aggregates: The modal class is 1 except in Lh and Ll where the modal class is 0. The proportion of cells in different intensity classes across the three selection lines differed significantly at high nutrient concentration (for Wh, Hh and Lh Chi square = 57.157, df = 6, P<0.0001) as well as low nutrient concentration (For Wl , Hl and Ll Chi square = 35.317, df = 6, P<0.0001). The effect of current nutrient concentration was not significant for W (Chi square = 2.35, df = 3, P = 0.503) but was significant for H (Chi square = 7.138, df = 3, P = 0.0676) and L (Chi square = 9.415, df = 3, P = 0.0243).

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Protein Aggregation in E. coli : Short Term and Long Term Effects of Nutrient Density

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107445

Figure Lengend Snippet: (n = 200±20 each for data in Fig. 2A to C). A: The proportion of aggregate free cells: Both short term exposure and long term selection in low nutrient concentrations increased the proportion of aggregate free cells. (chi sq = 38.15, p<0.0001). B: The mean fluorescence intensities of cells (expressed relative to mean Wh including aggregate free cells) under the 6 selection nutrition combinations: The grey columns denote the average including cells without visible aggregates. The black columns denote average calculated by excluding the aggregate free cells. *denotes significant difference from Wh. $ denotes significant difference between corresponding h and l conditions (at p<0.05). C: Frequency distribution of cells with fluorescence intensity classes of aggregates: The modal class is 1 except in Lh and Ll where the modal class is 0. The proportion of cells in different intensity classes across the three selection lines differed significantly at high nutrient concentration (for Wh, Hh and Lh Chi square = 57.157, df = 6, P<0.0001) as well as low nutrient concentration (For Wl , Hl and Ll Chi square = 35.317, df = 6, P<0.0001). The effect of current nutrient concentration was not significant for W (Chi square = 2.35, df = 3, P = 0.503) but was significant for H (Chi square = 7.138, df = 3, P = 0.0676) and L (Chi square = 9.415, df = 3, P = 0.0243).

Article Snippet: Observations were made using differential interference contrast (DIC) and fluorescence imaging on Zeiss Axioimager M-1 upright microscope (100X/1.40 Oil DIC M27) with a color digital camera controlled by Axio software 4.8.

Techniques: Selection, Fluorescence, Concentration Assay

(A) and after starvation for 4 days (B). The scale bar represents 20 µ. Inset: some of the larger aggregates did not disappear after prolonged starvation (30 days) but altered the morphology showing diffused fluorescence sometimes even exceeding the cell boundary.

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Protein Aggregation in E. coli : Short Term and Long Term Effects of Nutrient Density

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107445

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) and after starvation for 4 days (B). The scale bar represents 20 µ. Inset: some of the larger aggregates did not disappear after prolonged starvation (30 days) but altered the morphology showing diffused fluorescence sometimes even exceeding the cell boundary.

Article Snippet: Observations were made using differential interference contrast (DIC) and fluorescence imaging on Zeiss Axioimager M-1 upright microscope (100X/1.40 Oil DIC M27) with a color digital camera controlled by Axio software 4.8.

Techniques: Fluorescence

(n = 100±20 each for data in ). A and B: The mean fluorescence intensities before (grey bars) and after (black bars) starvation for 4 days. Means calculated excluding (A) and including (B) aggregate free cells. All columns are significantly reduced in B but not reduced or significantly increased in A. This suggests that all aggregate classes are not degraded proportionately. Many of the larger ones could be relatively resistant to degradation while the smaller ones degrade fast, thereby increasing the mean excluding aggregate free cells after degradation. *denotes significant difference from Wh. $ denotes significance between corresponding starved and unstarved populations (at p<0.05). C: The time course of decrease in the mean fluorescence intensity with starvation: The intensities are expressed relative to the mean intensity at zero hours. p: represents mean excluding aggregate free cells and q: represents including them in continued stationary phase. r: represents averages excluding aggregate free cells and s: represents including aggregate free cells in distilled water. Error bars show standard error of the mean.

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Protein Aggregation in E. coli : Short Term and Long Term Effects of Nutrient Density

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107445

Figure Lengend Snippet: (n = 100±20 each for data in ). A and B: The mean fluorescence intensities before (grey bars) and after (black bars) starvation for 4 days. Means calculated excluding (A) and including (B) aggregate free cells. All columns are significantly reduced in B but not reduced or significantly increased in A. This suggests that all aggregate classes are not degraded proportionately. Many of the larger ones could be relatively resistant to degradation while the smaller ones degrade fast, thereby increasing the mean excluding aggregate free cells after degradation. *denotes significant difference from Wh. $ denotes significance between corresponding starved and unstarved populations (at p<0.05). C: The time course of decrease in the mean fluorescence intensity with starvation: The intensities are expressed relative to the mean intensity at zero hours. p: represents mean excluding aggregate free cells and q: represents including them in continued stationary phase. r: represents averages excluding aggregate free cells and s: represents including aggregate free cells in distilled water. Error bars show standard error of the mean.

Article Snippet: Observations were made using differential interference contrast (DIC) and fluorescence imaging on Zeiss Axioimager M-1 upright microscope (100X/1.40 Oil DIC M27) with a color digital camera controlled by Axio software 4.8.

Techniques: Fluorescence